In an increasingly mediated world, what remains meaningful?

Monday, April 18, 2011

Scripting

My video for my KYHOI should be finished in a little over a week! Here is the script I'm working with, feel free to post thoughts or suggestions.


Fade in - Loui Giglio - Tell Everyone (2:59 - 3:30 ish?) (can be shortened if need be…)

Cut to screen recording of Loui Giglio Twitter.
Tweets
Then Followers  - 98,269 followers
VO: Telling the world is easier than ever...

 youtube church tour - monastery of the Holy Spirit (:28)
VO: The pulpit is changing from this -

VO: To This...
Facebook status update
Twitter what's happening

Twitter & Facebook sign ups
VO: And everyone has access to it…

VO: But what are we really saying?

Quote on screen "Societies have always been shaped more by the nature of the media by which men communicate than by the content of the communication."
-Marshal McLuhan

VO: And what is being heard?

Screen recording of twitter searches - #Jesus, #Church, #God and status updates
Slow - readable then speeding up to impress the quantity

VO: Have we considered the way that this new media changes the message enough to effectively use them to communicate the Gospel?

Jesus- public figure, FB
VO: Or is Jesus just another 'Like' Button?

MUSIC - e-world by zero-project

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Next Steps

So up until this point, my research has been rather passive... searching and seeing what I can find. Now I'm trying to start a conversation, actively get people's opinions and test my hypothesis. We'll see what happens...

The Mediums of The (Gospel) Message

As I've been researching, (via twitter searches, and facebook status newsfeeds), I've come to the conclusion, that the immersion in the world of social networks, is changing the message of the Christian Church. It's not simply that facebook and twitter are being used as a new way to communicate the Gospel. The pervasive use of facebook and twitter has actually changed the message that the church (as a body of individuals) is portraying of the Gospel. In effect, the advent of social networks, and the global scope of facebook and twitter, has made every Christian with access to them a preacher - or at least handed them a pulpit whether or not they choose to use it. And we are preaching in 160 character blurbs.

That's a scary thought. The Church doesn't let just anyone preach, usually you have to go to Bible college or  seminary where your theology becomes soundly grounded. But how many of us who are "preaching" from facebook or twitter, really have that sort of theological foundation? Do we really know what we are saying? Are we sure that it's the Truth? I don't think my theology is sound enough that I want to be held responsible for preaching it to the world.

I'm not saying that Christians shouldn't share the Gospel. I'm not saying that facebook and twitter can't be used for this purpose. What I am saying, is we should consider the medium that is being used, and how it shapes the message we send before preaching through it.

Marshal McLuhan, in his book The Medium is the Massage says, "Societies have always been shaped more by the nature of the media by which men communicate than by the content of the communication."

I propose that the mediums of facebook and twitter are shaping the message. I do believe that the Church needs to remain culturally relevant in today's connected world. And I think that in order to do that, the Church has to have a presence on facebook and twitter, and should be using these forms of communication to spread the gospel. But as a body (of individuals), it seems that the medium has run away with us. It's taken the intended message hostage, and is turning people off to Christ where we would have them come to him.

Tweets like; "#ItsSadWhen some people r so ignorant they refuse to see that #God is real. Look around u & look at urself without #God there would be no u" and "@_S_P_R_ First off there is a #God... He is the man who created you & gave you life... So who lied to u & said the world is science? huh?"and even Bible verses as facebook status are turning non-believers off to God, Christianity, Christians, and in some cases organized religion in general.

I think where we are trying to encourage, we might be - at least to our fellow believers, but simultaneously we might be turning people off to the true message of the Gospel. Have we really counted that cost?

So that's my case for my "Knock Your Heads Off Idea" - there needs to be an understanding of the way these new mediums change the message before we as a Church can effectively use them as a tool for communicating the Gospel.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Narrowing the View

As I've been researching the Christian Church and our use of new media, a lot of questions have come up for me, the hard part is choosing ONE to focus on. As I've been pondering what angle I find most interesting, I think I've finally decided on how to narrow my view.

The question: What is the message of the Church as portrayed through new social media (i.e. facebook, twitter, blogs, etc.)?

The Church is certainly using new media. Some churches I've found have a church blog & podcast, sermons are posted to YouTube, churches & christian organizations have websites and video promos for different bible studies, missions trips, new books, etc. The church is incorporating new media into the way it worships too. And while it certainly seems that some churches are stuck in the past and not likely to reach anyone in the younger generations living in today's increasingly connected world, it would seem that the trend is to use today's media to communicate with believers and non-believers alike.

Certainly, individuals within the Church are using new media too, and their using it to share their faith. Facebook has a section in your profile for Religious Views, and it's become trendy to have a Bible verse as your status or latest tweet... at least within the Church. YouTube has tons of videos posted by Christians in an effort to reach out to people or to encourage or challenge other believers.

Asking if the Church is using new media is not the question anymore.

Marshall McLuhan proposed the idea that "The Medium Is The Message". The message changes (or can change) depending on the medium that is being used to convey it. With this in mind, is the message of the Church changing through it's use of new social media? If so, what is the new message? Or is it the same?

As a christian, I think this is a really important question for the Church to be asking. What are we telling the world about God? Is our message changing because of the media we use?